Dhurandhar/dhurandhar propaganda debate

Is Dhurandhar Propaganda? Both Sides of India's Biggest Film Debate

Only 37% of critics rated it positively. It grossed ₹1,056 crore. The gap tells you everything about why this debate matters.

Dhurandhar has exposed, as one critic put it, 'the fault lines of Indian film criticism.' The divide between critic response (37% positive on Rotten Tomatoes) and audience response (overwhelming enthusiasm, record box office) is not just a matter of taste — it reflects a fundamental disagreement about what Indian cinema should be and what patriotism on screen means.

The Case That It Is Propaganda

Critics who call Dhurandhar propagandistic point to its unambiguously heroic Indian characters set against cartoonishly evil Pakistani criminals, its glorification of torture as a justified means, its use of real historical events as backdrop for fictional heroism, and its release timed to political tensions. They argue it functions to consolidate certain political sentiments rather than explore genuine complexity.

The Case That It Is Not

Defenders point out that Dhurandhar is far more ambivalent about its heroes than propaganda typically allows. The protagonist is psychologically destroyed by the mission. The intelligence chief carries visible guilt. The film does not offer the triumphant nationalist catharsis that pure propaganda would. It is, they argue, a film that loves India but does not pretend the love is free.

The Audience's Response

Indian audiences voted with their attendance — ₹1,056 crore worth. For many, the film expressed something they already felt: pride in India's intelligence and military, anxiety about real threats, a desire to see those feelings represented seriously on screen. Whether that is propaganda consumption or legitimate emotional resonance is genuinely contested.

What the Debate Reveals

The Dhurandhar debate is ultimately about whose perspective counts as the default in Indian cinema. Critics largely from urban, English-language backgrounds versus audiences from across the country with very different relationships to questions of patriotism, security, and national identity.

Talk Through What You're Feeling

Strong opinions about a film — especially when they conflict with those around you — can surface deeper feelings about identity, belonging, and what you believe. These are worth exploring. Talksy is a judgment-free space.

Talk to a Listener on Talksy — Free & Anonymous

Available 24/7 · No name needed · Real human listeners

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dhurandhar biased?

All films have a perspective. Whether Dhurandhar's perspective crosses from legitimate patriotism into propaganda depends significantly on your own political and cultural standpoint.

Why do critics and audiences disagree so much on Dhurandhar?

The film operates in a space where cultural, political, and emotional factors shape response more than technical filmmaking criteria. Critics and general audiences often bring very different frameworks to these questions.

Should I watch Dhurandhar if I disagree with its politics?

Many viewers who are sceptical of its politics have found the film worth engaging with for its performances and the questions it raises, even if they reject its conclusions.

Has Dhurandhar been criticised for glorifying violence?

Yes — the film's depiction of torture and aggressive interrogation methods has been criticised for presenting them as heroic rather than questioning their ethics.

More on Dhurandhar

What Is Talksy?

Talksy is an Indian emotional support app that connects you with real, trained listeners — anonymously and instantly. No appointments, no personal details required. Just a safe space to say what you're actually feeling, to someone who is genuinely listening.

Films like Dhurandhar often surface feelings that are hard to talk about with people you know. Talksy is built for exactly those moments.